Friday, August 22, 2014

Should there be tolerance and the avoidance of dogmatic truth claims, or fanaticism in which one's position is absolutely right?

Proverbs 28:5

Evildoers do not understand what is right,
    but those who seek the Lord understand it fully.

Proverbs 29:27

The righteous detest the dishonest;
    the wicked detest the upright.

Such sayings portray a world apparently without a middle ground, a world with a fundamental conflict between good and evil

Depiction of the Devil as seen in the Codex Gigas,
the largest extant medieval manuscript in the world
Proverbs 28:5 and 29:27 portray the mutual intolerance of the righteous and the wicked. The assumption is that righteous folk understand and align themselves with the divine perspective on good and evil (28:5; 29:7). Wicked folk and wickedness are abhorrent to God (6:16-19; 8:7; 21:27), and in this the righteous imitate God. God's enemies are their enemies, because God's enemies do evil. This thought comes to strong expression in Psalm 139:19-22 (from the divine side, confer Genesis 12:3; Numbers 24:9). Such sayings portray a world apparently without a middle ground, a world with a fundamental conflict between good and evil. In our tolerant, pluralistic society, such thinking seems troublesome, especially when we see the violence done by groups seeking to impose their understanding of good and evil on others. Should we not rather "live and let live"?
Yet Jesus also spoke in terms of conflict. "Whoever is not with me is against me, and whoever does not gather with me scatters" (Matthew 12:130). How are we to understand such biblical language today?

One the one hand there is a strong insistence on tolerance and avoiding dogmatic truth claims. On the other hand, there is a fanaticism in which divergent views should be destroyed

A suicide bombing at the moment of detonation
in Akuressa, Sri Lanka on March 10, 2009.
Two extreme currents compete in the contemporary culture, and yet they seem to feed on one another in a strange symbiosis. One the one hand there is a strong insistence -- itself often dogmatic -- on tolerance and avoiding dogmatic truth claims. No one person or group may presume to have the truth because such claims are actually covert bids for power and self-aggrendisement. A moral collary, especially in the media, seems to be that "anything goes." On the other hand there is a fanaticism in which one's position or the position of one's group is absolutely right; nothing is ambiguous, and divergent views should be destroyed. To the extent that such thinking is theologically aware, human thought is identified with God's thought, ignoring that even divine revelation must be interpreted by fallible humans. In such thinking "the end justifies the means," including violence. All balance is lost; public discourse is destroyed.

Tolerance is not an adequate response to evil

The punishing of John Hooper during the Marian Persecutions
on February 9, 1555 as depicted in Foxe's Book of Martyrs.
Proverbs 29:27 offers a reproof to the first current rather than the second. An yet, unless this proverb is taken seriously, the second, fanatic current will be given free play. Proverbs reminds us that we may not elevate moral ambiguity and religious mystery to the point of relativism, where the lines between right and wrong, good and evil, true and false, are erased (Isaiah 5:18-23). At that point tolerance is no longer a virtue, but moral indifference in the face of evil. It is an abandonment of the social responsibility to which the God of the Bible continually calls us. Christians cannot, for example, remain silent and inactive in the face of oppression or racial hate -- whether in Nazi Europe or in America with its burning of black churches. Tolerance is not an adequate response to evil.

The Scriptures insist that in and through creation God has shown all humans enough of God's own self and of good and evil that we are "without excuse" (Romans 1:18-20; 2:14-15). No one may say, "we did not know" (Proverbs 24:12 and 8:1-36). God has shown what is good, and what God requires is especially open to those who have the Scriptures (Micah 6:8, Proverbs 29:18).

Source: Van Leeuwen, Raymond. “Proverbs.” In The New Interpreter’s Bible, Volume 5:17-264. (Nashville: Abingdon, 1997), page 246-247.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Douglas F. Kelly compares God's ability to speak light into the dark human soul and make it reborn to God's speaking light into existence.

The Sending Forth of Light The Ancient of Days  ( William Blake , 1794) A third divine action occurred on the first day of creation: &...